gullindagan: (Default)
"There was a man called Svan, who lived on a farm called Svanhill in Bjarnarfjord, to the north of Steingrimsfjord. Svan was extremely skilled in witchcraft; he was Hallgerd's maternal uncle, and a very unpleasant person to have any dealings with." This is from Njal's Saga, page 57-58 (translated by Magnus Magnusson and Hermann Palsson) In the saga as a whole, Svan has a rather tiny part, but it was quite notable to me as someone with an interest in historical accounts of heathen magic. In the story, Svan is a renowned magician, who apparently has some power over the weather, as he causes a thick fog to settle in the path of his friend's  pursuers. His friend is Thjostolf, who is the foster father of Svan's niece Hallgerd, who's husband was killed by Thjostolf after hitting her. The account of the magic is rather interesting: "Svan took a goat-skin and swung is round his head, chanting: 'Let there be fog / And let there be phantoms, / Weird marvels / To baffle your hunters." (pg 61) Fog and darkness then enveloped Thjostolf's pursuers until they decided to go back home. This is where I might wish that I had an Icelandic version of the text, and a reading knowledge of Icelandic, because I would like to know what words these were translated from. But I don't, and it doesn't matter too much for this essay.

Now, it should be stated that the Icelandic sagas were written about 300 years after the events that they are said to record, many years after Iceland became Christian, so we cannot be sure that this is really a completely accurate portrayal of heathen magic. But, the time, place and culture of the saga writers are certainly much, much, closer to the pre-Christian period than we are. As Peter Hallberg says in The Icelandic Saga (translated by Paul Schach) "Judging from the contemporary document Sturlunga, the leaven of the new religion, even in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, had scarcely permeated the habitual manner of thinking of the Icelanders." (page 113) So, whether or not these are completely accurate portrayals, they're definitely not completely false, or completely useless to us, in fact, I think they can be very helpful, especially if read with the knowledge of a critical perspective.

Overall though, Svan's little ritual is a pretty small snippet. In another part of Njal's Saga Queen Gunnhild lays a spell on her lover Hrut, who has decided to leave Norway and go back home to his native Iceland, where he has betrothed. He lies to Gunnhild about this though, saying that he doesn't have a woman back home. Gunnhild gives Hrut a gold bracelet and tells him "If I have as much power over you as I think, the spell I now lay on you will prevent your ever enjoying the woman in Iceland on whom you have set your heart. With other women you may have your will, but never with her. And now you much suffer as well as I, since you did not trust me with the truth." (pg. 49) When he goes back home, he is never able to consummate his marriage, which ends in divorce.

Svan's act of magic was about protection from enemies, Gunnhild's a vindictive act towards a lover leaving her. Both of these fit in with a lot of magic practiced across the world, though one might consider both of these more "low" magic, if "high" magic means "theurgy" or "initation." The last place that Svan appears in Njal's Saga is when his fishing boat "encountered a fierce easterly gale that drove their boat ashore at Veidilaus with the loss of all lives. Some fishermen at Kaldbak thought they had seen Svan being warmly welcomed into the innermost depths of Kaldbakhorn Mountain; other people denied this and said that it was all lies. But no one could  deny that no trace of Svan was ever seen again, either living or dead." (pg 68) I was very intrigued when I read this, as I found two very different interpretations forthcoming in my thoughts. One one hand, it is very interesting that this wizard who used the weather to foil his enemies is destroyed by the weather. Were his wizardly powers so deficient that he could not foresee the gale or avert it? Was this a 'karmic' repercussion for using the weather to destroy his enemies? Or a magical reprisal from a different enemy? (there aren't many details of his life given, but I might remind the reader that he was "a very unpleasant person to have any dealings with.")  Or, was he such a great magician that he entered into the earth as an Initiate, as Elijah rode the chariot of fire into the heavens? Of course, we do not know. He may have been a real historical figure, he might have been a literary device. If he was a just a literary device, he also may have been based off of oral legends of heathen magicians. What is remarkable to me is that this ambivalence and ambiguity is preserved in this Christian-authored saga. Well, that and of course the image of the widely feared magician being welcomed as a guest of the great mountain.

Svan was a well-known wizard, and Gunnhild an infamous witch, but the sagas are chock full of more normal persons with psychic powers. Premonitory dreams, second sight, and fateful pronouncements seem to be rather common, even if they also fulfill many literary functions. It seems like these sorts of psychic powers were taken for granted amongst the audience of 13th century Iceland. This of course brings up to me the question of fate in Icelandic society. These psychic powers showed people their fates, their doom. And it seems to me that in many cases, the characters, being forewarned, acted as if they wanted to manifest their doom.

In The Icelandic Saga, Peter Hallberg argues that "If one were to try by some sort of magic performance or incantation to exert an influence on his destiny, that would in fact mean that one did not really regard that destiny as destiny in the strict meaning of the word." (pg 88) That must mean though, that when Sven wrapped a goat skin around his head and made an incantation to confuse his enemies, he was destined to do so. Or, that he didn't really believe in destiny in the "strict meaning of the word." Hallberg later states that "Even the greatest hero was unable to influence fate as such. What he did have control over was his own bearing and attitude toward fate" (pg 99) This may have been what the viking age heroes believed, it certainly seems like that when one considered the Voluspa, but this may also have been just what the later saga writers believed. This level of fatalism seems absurd to me though, and it seems like something that you can't prove one way or another. I prefer to act as if I have free will, whether or not I do, or how much of it I have.

To me, it makes sense that every action that one performs is etched on their character, and the grooves that are produced by these actions determine one's future possible actions. It is possible to change the grooves, but only by much time and effort. Magical ritual is one way to work towards changing the grooves towards what one wants to become. At this point though, one must ask, what do I want to become? And why do I want to become that? The perspective that one has of the world, and one's place in the world, is of vast importance in the answering of these questions.

Here it might be useful to recite JMG's recent contribution to definitions of magic: "magic is the art and science of participation in the spiritual forces of the cosmos" Using this definition, we can see ourselves as a node in a massive, living, interrelated cosmos. A cosmos with beings much greater than we are, ones we can ask for help. But also beings who might use us for their own ends, as so many innocent (and not so innocent) characters were used by those more conniving in the sagas. So what do we do? Keep working, treat others well, keep seeking towards a higher and deeper understanding. Or at least, that's what I'll be doing.






gullindagan: (Default)
In a previous thread, a commenter (shout out to JP again!) brought up the idea of Germanic Soul Lore in relation to the Planes of Western Occultism. According to traditional occultism, which I have received from JMG and Dion Fortune, we have roughly 5 planes with corresponding bodies. The physical, etheric, astral, mental and spiritual.  The physical plane is the plane of, well, the physical body... The etheric is the plane of subtle energy, like "chi". You can feel the etheric body slightly move out of synch with the physical when you go "wheee" over a quick hill in a car. Also, this seems to be the body that survives for a little while after death, but which vampires keep alive through etheric feeding. This is also the "etheric double" which can bilocate, or which can maybe go into battle as a wolf or a bear... The "astral" plane is literally the plane of the Stars, and is the plane of fate and karma as well as images, thoughts and feelings. This is the plane we enter while dreaming, while scrying, thinking or imagining. The "mental" plane is the plane of Meaning. We are just now developing the mental body, we only have a "mental sheath". Above, or behind, within, or otherwise past the mental plane is the "spiritual plane". This is the realm of the spiritual forces which we can only comprehend through the astral and the mental planes, but cannot perceive directly from our current stage. However, it is my understanding that the "divine spark" which is actually the core, or essence of our being, "exists" (the spiritual plane is ineffable, and "exists" isn't really the right word, but there is no right word) on the spiritual plane. The way that I see it, one of the main goals of spiritual work is to develop the lower bodies to the point where the divine spark and the ego are in conscious relation. This work can be helped along by guiding spirits, such as the Holy Guardian Angel, Angel of the Nativity, or other such entities.

The ancient Germanic peoples also had a complicated understanding of what makes up an "individual" (not so unable-to-be-divided after all, eh?) From what I understand about that complex, which I have received mainly from Flowers/Thorsson,  there are multiple bodies that don't exactly correspond to the occult "planes". There the "lyke" or "lich" which does pretty much correspond to the physical body exactly. The "hyde" is the etheric energy, the "ond" (the gift given by Odin in the Voluspa, which means "breath of life") I would also definitely place in the "etheric" plane, but it is in a way connected directly to the Spiritual.  The word "spirit" comes from the Latin for "breath", and I see "Ond" as basically the same as the Hindu "prana." The "hugh" or "hugr" and myne or "minni", or, thought and memory (the same as "Huginn" and "Muninn") to me are two parts of the "astral" body. The "wode" is inspiration, frenzy, and I might consider this a part that reaches between the Astral and Mental, maybe something like the "mental sheath." I think the "Fetch/Fylgia" is a guardian spirit, like the HGA, "Hamingja" is basically "personal power" or "charisma" or "personal magnatism" and "Wyrd/Orlog" is obviously related to "Fate", "Destiny" and "Karma" - though that will have to be another post.

In general, I am still trying to fit these together, but they are like two different artists, one using watercolors and one using oil paint, to paint a portrait. I'd be quite happy to discuss these ideas further in the comments and in future posts. It seems like the Germanic peoples had a much more developed sense of the etheric realms and etheric/spiritual tech than we do now. It might also be interesting to compare Maria Kvilhaug's idea of the initiations hidden in the Norse myths, where the hero faces the internal, female, sun-like higher self, to the idea of the Divine Spark. That might merit it's own post though...

Also, I found this explanation of the Old Saxon ideas of the soul-complex which might be interesting to folks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23aaWeTwnuU
gullindagan: (Default)
As a preface, I'd like to state that these posts are a way for me to understand my own thinking better. To take my readings, meditations and experiences and order them, so that I might see more clearly what is really going on. In past posts and in future posts, I deal directly with the content that I'm absorbing, wrestling with authors to separate the gold from the dross. Words seem to me to be a very brute way of understanding something, they are both blunt and slippery. In a way, we are all barbarians to our inner selves, muttering "bar bar bar" to each other and pointing at rocks, pointing at the sun, and misunderstanding most things any more abstract. Definitions are slippery, and meanings are constantly shifting, and I am constantly learning. So this essay is a trial, an attempt, an assail at meaning. And I am quite positive that my understanding will change as I grow and learn further. But, the actual action of me putting these thoughts to screen is a part of that growing and learning.

So what is a "heathen"? Or, what does it mean to me? It seems like everybody who calls themselves "heathen", or, is called "heathen" has a slightly different take on it. There are Norse Pagans, Heathens, Odinists, Asatru, Vanatru, even Rokkatru, those who follow the "Northern Tradition," hard polytheists, soft polytheists, pantheists, etc etc. For me, "heathen" also means different things. One definition, that probably has the best tension between general and specific, is: "somebody who follows the old gods of Northern Europe." So does this mean that they should be followed exclusively? Not necessarily. Certainly, many folks will just honor one pantheon, or set of pantheons (Aesir and Vanir for instance.) But I see polytheism as an inherent part of Heathenry, and if one makes offerings to both Norse gods and Hindu gods, to me, that one is Heathen. And also maybe Hindu! There are records of historical heathens worshiping both the old gods and Jesus, for instance King Raedwald of East Anglia who kept an alter to Jesus in his pagan temple.

As a word, "heathen" means "dweller of the heath" or, the wilderness, the country. "Pagan" means something similar. but the people of Northern Europe didn't even have a name for their "religion" before the Christians started calling them heathens and pagans. Christianity was largely a urban phenomenon, and country people clung to their old ways for many centuries after they were nominally "christian." Apparently, they would even pray to gods though the image of a saint. For instance, Thor was prayed and petitioned to under the name of St. Olaf! It's rather interesting that now Christianity is mostly followed in the hinterlands, but I guess that's how things go.

I, personally, as somebody who lives in the country and comes from country folk (though I was educated in a small city) like that aspect of the term. I identify with the woods, the mountains, the streams and lakes. To me, this is in many ways just as important as honoring the deities. The spirits of the land, the ancestors, the elves, these are all important spirits to come into right relationship with.

Maria Kvilhaug has an essay about this topic too, and she brings up the point that the Norse word for heathen is related to the word for "shining" and "enlightenment". The name of the volva from the Voluspa, Heidr, comes from that same root word. The shining heath, the bright clearing in the woods. the brilliant sky, the light of spiritual illumination. I think this is a valid way of using meaning, and I like the way this meaning stretches the possibilities of the term.

So, as somebody who honors the old gods, revels in the wild, works to enter right relationship with the spirits of the land, and seeks after spiritual illumination, "heathen" is a fine word to label me, even if I don't really like to be labelled anything.
gullindagan: (Default)
A reader, (shoutout to JP!) asked that I write " a post where you discuss in more depth your preferred sources for magic and religion, especially the Germanic ones." so, here goes.

Firstly, I'd like to state that I am at least as much of an "occultist" as I am a "heathen", though I will write a future post on what "heathenry" means to me. I am also a bit idiosyncratic in general.  I have tried multiple paths over my years seeking Beauty, Power, Wisdom, and Truth, and have learned from each of them. This mixture of heathenry and Golden Dawn magic that I am currently working on seems to finally fit just right, at least for now (though I am fully committed to mastering this system before I move onto anything else anyway.)

In regards to magic in general, John Michael Greer is my main go to. I've read a lot of his books, and many of the other books on magic that I've read have been recommended by him. Dion Fortune is big for me, I've read almost all of her books (maybe 75%). I've also read a wide variety of other authors, including folks like Israel Regardie, Mark Stavish, Christopher Warnock, Gordon White, R.J. Stewart, Jason Miller, Franz Hartmann, Mouni Sadhu, as well as classics like Levi, Ficino, Picatrix, Agrippa, etc and many more, but JMG and Dion Fortune have been the ones I've dived the furthest into. I've also listened in depth to many podcasts, including Glitch Bottle, Rune Soup, The Secret History of Western Esotericism, Plant Cunning Podcast, and many others.

As with most things, my style of learning is to take in a wide swath, going deep into what interests me the most, and synthesizing up my own mind by taking into account all the information, weighed against my own experience and ideas.

With Germanic religion and magic, this is essential. There really isn't that much known about it, so there are a lot of opinions. I have read a lot of Edred Thorsson/Stephen Flowers, as well as books by Maria Kvilhaug, Nigel Pennick, Thomas Karlssson,  Alaric Albertson, Diana Paxson, Stephen Pollington, Galina Krasskova and Raven Kaldera. I've also watched a lot of Jackson Crawford's youtube videos and have a translation of his. Now this is just a fraction of the authors who have written on the subject, and if there are books that any of you dear readers have found especially useful, please let me know!

The main thing though, is to read the primary sources. I like to read multiple translations of the eddas and look at the actual old Norse and see what the words are signifying. Reading and meditating on the eddas is essential to understanding them, and to getting the mythic framework deep into the subconscious. Same thing with the runes. Meditating on the runes and learning the rune poems is essential. The sagas, Tacitus, etc, are also important to read, as well as a general reading of history, especially the time period from the fall of the western Roman empire til the high middle ages. In this regard, Pagan Europe by Nigel Pennick and Prudence Jones is good, so is The Barbarian Conversion by Richard Fletcher, as well as The Last Apocalypse: Europe at the year 1000 A.D. by James Reston.

In regards to my opinions of the Germanic magicians that I've listed, none of them do I agree with 100%. But then again, there aren't many people who I agree with that much. Reading all of them as foils against each other, getting rid of the dross and keeping the gold has been a good strategy. That being said, Thorsson/Flowers is a very competent, well educated, and successful mage in any regard, let alone in the Germanic/Heathen milieu. His book Futhark was my first introduction to the world of Heathenry and Germanic magic, and it was a good intro. His book ALU: An Advanced Guide to Operative Runology is likewise a very solid advanced book. Some of his others are hit or miss, and he has some obvious problems (I'm just not into satanism,setianism, the Left Hand Path or Traditionalism... very meh to me) but he's the standard that I compare other Germanic occultists to. I also really liked Maria Kvilaug's Seed of Yggdrasil. It's big, sprawling, large, not well edited, and it kinda seems like she wrote half of it on mushrooms, but I really did love it and it gives a very interesting perspective on the myths from somebody who was raised with them and studied them at an advanced academic level.

In regards to religion, books, blogs and videos by Galina Krasskova and Raven Kaldera have been very helpful, but again, I take each of them with several grains of salt.

Also, Jackson Crawford is about the furthest thing from an occultist that you can get, but that's kinda nice, and it's nice to compare things to his perspective.

All in all, I'm basically using a framework that I developed by reading Greer, Fortune, bits from Thorsson, and then going directly to the myths and other primary material.


Hope that helps, and if anybody has any other books they think would be useful for me to read, please let me know! And of course I'm down to continue this conversation in the comments and in future blog posts if you want clarification or there's a fun tangent to explore.



gullindagan: (Default)
In order to become a Magician, one must at least try to understand what "magic" is. We are not making up "magic" out of whole cloth, but are given a tapestry woven by those Weird Sisters with which we might decipher, and learn, what "magic" means. "Meaning" itself is a tapestry, and is part of the tapestry; nothing means anything outside of it's relationship to everything else, at least, nothing meaningful . So we look to what has come before to understand the present and the future, and pull at golden threads till the treasure is revealed. Let's look at some definitions.

John Michael Greer often recites the definition given by Dion Fortune when asked what magic is. "Magic is the art and science of causing change in consciousness in accordance with the will." This is a riff on the definition of magic given by her elder contemporary, Aleister Crowley: " Magick is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will"... as you can plainly see, Fortune altered her definition to emphasize that part about it changing "consciousness" in accordance with will. This makes it a little more specific than Crowley's definition, but it also makes it more accessible to a modern, materialistic, post-Freudian society while also keeping the back door open to Mystery. Yes, the mass psychological spells of advertising and propaganda are magic. So is psychotherapy! And New Thought! Since your subjective experience of the world is malleable, by changing your consciousness, you can literally change your life!

But, if everything is Consciousness, as many sages say, then what can't magic do?

Edred Thorsson/Stephen Flowers, in his book ALU: An Advanced Guide to Operative Runology defines magic as "a technique by which the human being is able, by the power of volition expressed through symbols, to influence events in subjective and/or objective reality." Now Thorsson/Flowers is known mainly for his work with Runes, which is a magical language; they are symbols used to express the will of the Magician, thus affecting the change. So he's a bit focused on the symbolic side. Isn't there more to magic than manipulating symbols? 

Let's look at the main toolkit of the Golden Dawn magician: rituals. These also are constructed from symbols. The pentagrams, the divine names, the movements, all of these have meaning and that's the point. By repeating these rituals, you empower them with meaning, and you start affecting consciousness. Here it might be useful to remember a famous phrase from the psychoanalyst Jacque Lacan "The unconscious is structured like a language" Hmmm...

This still, seems rather limiting. Isn't there anything outside of language/symbols/meaning? Sure, lots. But how can you make sense of or describe "it"? In one way, this is what I see as the goal of the true Magician. To master their own consciousness, and to transcend it, or as JMG might say, to build the Mental body. The Spiritual realm is higher than the Mind realm though, and by connecting with the Divine, through symbols, one can connect to currents of power that are much farther beyond the human ken.

Most of the time, magic is about changing things in the world, look at all the folk magic traditions. Getting a lover, getting a job, healing illness, etc... In common terms, magic is about power. This is why the powerless look to magic, and why the powerful have their own kind to keep them in power. But power is worse than useless without wisdom. Without wisdom, power can actually be quite dangerous. Magic can rebound in unanticipated ways, can send the magician into spirals of malaise, can lead the one who wants to become more powerful into becoming a slave; to malicious spirits, to their own  fears and desires, or to ignorance and senility. Good thing that
because magic is an art and science that takes discipline to master it can be rather hard to wield magic effectively without wisdom. You must master "concentration, visualization, and memorization" as Thorsson/Flowers writes in his book Icelandic Magic: Practical Secrets of the Northern Grimoires.  There are those though with inborn gifts, but I have heard as many stories of these souls burning out as becoming great Magicians.

This is why initiation is essential. Initiation aligns the magician with the divine forces of order in the universe, and helps the aspirant become more divine themselves.  As Thorsson/Flowers says in Icelandic Magic, "Most of magical effort should be spent in gaining knowledge, wisdom and self-transformation. Most of your woes will be healed when this process is successful." This is something that I have found to be very true. Often times, just by focusing on my own transformation, the problems I have in the world take care of themselves. This is different than the "spiritual bypassing" that one sees so often in spiritual circles, where people escape the problems in their lives by chanting mantras or practicing mind-numbing kinds of meditation, or doing lots and lots of ayahuasca. In self-transformation you must confront your problems head on as part of your process of initiation. Often this can happen by such mundane pursuits as journaling, inquiring into your motivations, intentions, and trauma, or just feeling the feelings that come up and acknowledging them. This can also take the form of spiritual retreats, theurgic ritual, meditation, and scrying. But by developing these skills: of discipline, concentration, visualization, and self-knowledge, the problems of the world become much easier to deal with.

Of course, there may be still things that require magical action to affect. And by using that power, initiation is also furthered.

What does magic mean to you?


Profile

gullindagan: (Default)
gullindagan

June 2024

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23 242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 03:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios